Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


There is no climate emergency


#Climate #science should be less political, while climate policies should be more #scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling output is not the result of magic: computer models are human-made. What comes out is fully dependent on what theoreticians and programmers have put in: hypotheses, assumptions, relationships, parameterizations, stability constraints, etc. Unfortunately, in mainstream climate science most of this input is undeclared.

To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models. In future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.

https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/

Als Antwort auf tom s

...message brought to you with funding from The National Petroleum Council
Als Antwort auf tom s

Just curious, @tom s Do you believe that second-hand tobacco smoke could be dangerous for someone who lives with a cigarette smoker?
Als Antwort auf tom s

No easy answer, without more information about to know, what it means, "to live with". Smoking is surely a bad thing for humans.